Welcome to my New Blog... Graphs Tables for Skin Cancer

Skin Cancer, mesothelioma, Mesothelioma Cancer, Mesothelioma Lwayer
=======================================================

Monday, June 23, 2008

Fwd: Prevalence of oncogenic human papillomavirus infection in an organised screening population in Finland.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HubMed - cancer <rssfwd@rssfwd.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 6:01 PM
Subject: Prevalence of oncogenic human papillomavirus infection in an organised screening population in Finland.
To: mesothelioma77@gmail.com


[1]Int J Cancer. 2008 Jun 19;
Leinonen M, Kotaniemi-Talonen L, Anttila A, Dyba T, Tarkkanen J, Nieminen P

A persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is a necessary condition for developing a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. The viral aetiology in cervical carcinogenesis has stimulated attempts to use HPV DNA detection in cervical cancer screening. In Finland there is an ongoing study assessing the benefits of primary HPV DNA testing in the setting of centrally organised mass screening for cervical cancer. Here we present the age-specific prevalence of hrHPV infection and associated sociodemographic factors of 16,895 women aged 25-65 years attending the 5-yearly cervical cancer screening between years 2003 and 2004. The overall hrHPV prevalence rate was 7.5%. The peak prevalence at the age group of 25-29 was 24.1% decreasing steadily thereafter to approximately 2.9% in women aged 65 years. Young age and marital status were the main determinants for oncogenic HPV types. Our study confirms the inverse relationship between age and hrHPV prevalence reported in many developed countries. As our prevalence rates and hence background risk for cervical cancer are not lower than in other European countries, it is likely that our lowest cervical cancer burden in Europe is due to health care actions justifying the organised cervical cancer screening. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.



___
Source: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18566992
--
 ~
Powered by [5]RssFwd, a service of [6]Blue Sky Factory, Inc

 

Fwd: [Predicting response to therapy in breast cancer]



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HubMed - breast cancer <rssfwd@rssfwd.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 6:02 PM
Subject: [Predicting response to therapy in breast cancer]
To: mesothelioma77@gmail.com


[1]Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2008; 48(3): 113-7
Strunz K, Deissler H, Kreienberg R, Sauer G

Molecular staging of breast cancer with microarray technologies leads to different gene expression profiles distinguishing 4 special groups: luminal A and B subtype, HER2 subtype and basal subtype. These 4 groups show a different prognosis as well as different behaviours and responses to adjuvant therapy. The development of gene expression profiles to classify breast cancer may contribute to the targeted institution of adjuvant therapies. Especially the 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype DX) and the 70-gene profile (Mamma-print) have become intensively examined prognostic and predictive tools. As chemotherapy is an integral component of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer but estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer is the most common type, patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy is of particular interest. In instances when the benefit from chemotherapy seems modest, there is a decision making tool beside traditional histopathological parameters that might provide additional objective prognostic and predictive information. Those genomic decision making approaches may yield more rational treatment choices and may keep patients from systemic treatment modalities of lower value.



___
Source: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18566527
--
 ~
Powered by [5]RssFwd, a service of [6]Blue Sky Factory, Inc