Fwd: Nanotechnology for breast cancer therapy.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HubMed - breast cancer <rssfwd@rssfwd.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:30 PM
Subject: Nanotechnology for breast cancer therapy.
To: mesothelioma77@gmail.com


[1]Biomed Microdevices. 2008 Jul 29;
Tanaka T, Decuzzi P, Cristofanilli M, Sakamoto JH, Tasciotti E, Robertson FM, Ferrari M

Breast cancer is the field of medicine with the greatest presence of nanotechnological therapeutic agents in the clinic. A pegylated form of liposomally encapsulated doxorubicin is routinely used for treatment against metastatic cancer, and albumin nanoparticulate chaperones of paclitaxel were approved for locally recurrent and metastatic disease in 2005. These drugs have yielded substantial clinical benefit, and are steadily gathering greater beneficial impact. Clinical trials currently employing these drugs in combination with chemo and biological therapeutics exceed 150 worldwide. Despite these advancements, breast cancer morbidity and mortality is unacceptably high. Nanotechnology offers potential solutions to the historical challenge that has rendered breast cancer so difficult to contain and eradicate: the extreme biological diversity of the disease presentation in the patient population and in the evolutionary changes of any individual disease, the multiple pathways that drive disease progression, the onset of 'resistance' to established therapeutic cocktails, and the gravity of the side effects to treatment, which result from generally very poor distribution of the injected therapeutic agents in the body. A fundamental requirement for success in the development of new therapeutic strategies is that breast cancer specialists-in the clinic, the pharmaceutical and the basic biological laboratory-and nanotechnologists-engineers, physicists, chemists and mathematicians-optimize their ability to work in close collaboration. This further requires a mutual openness across cultural and language barriers, academic reward systems, and many other 'environmental' divides. This paper is respectfully submitted to the community to help foster the mutual interactions of the breast cancer world with micro- and nano-technology, and in particular to encourage the latter community to direct ever increasing attention to breast cancer, where an extraordinary beneficial impact may result. The paper initiates with an introductory overview of breast cancer, its current treatment modalities, and the current role of nanotechnology in the clinic. Our perspectives are then presented on what the greatest opportunities for nanotechnology are; this follows from an analysis of the role of biological barriers that adversely determine the biological distribution of intravascularly injected therapeutic agents. Different generations of nanotechnology tools for drug delivery are reviewed, and our current strategy for addressing the sequential bio-barriers is also presented, and is accompanied by an encouragement to the community to develop even more effective ones.



___
Source: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18663578
--
 ~
Powered by [5]RssFwd, a service of [6]Blue Sky Factory, Inc

 

Fwd: Does the eradication of Helicobacter pylori delay the diagnosis of gastric cancer?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HubMed - cancer <rssfwd@rssfwd.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:30 PM
Subject: Does the eradication of Helicobacter pylori delay the diagnosis of gastric cancer?
To: mesothelioma77@gmail.com


[1]Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul 29; 1-5
Kokkola A, Sipponen P, Arkkila P, Danielson H, Puolakkainen P

Objective. To assess the frequency of gastric cancer patients having received eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori, and whether this treatment has any influence on the delay in the diagnosis or the stage of the tumours at the time of the operation. Material and methods. A total of 119 consecutive patients with gastric cancer were interviewed preoperatively between 2001 and 2003 at the Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital. Abdominal symptoms, previous endoscopies, previous H. pylori testing and eradication therapies were recorded. Results. Of these patients, 112 (94%) had abdominal symptoms before the cancer diagnosis, and in 110 patients (92%) these symptoms were alarming or had changed before the cancer diagnosis. Thirty-five patients (29%) had received H. pylori eradication therapy prior to the diagnosis of gastric cancer (15 after onset or change in symptoms, 10 more than 5 years prior to the cancer diagnosis). The median duration of alarm, new or changed symptoms was longer among patients with H. pylori eradication therapy after the onset or change in their symptoms as compared to other patients (12.0 versus 4.5 months, p=0.001). However, there was no difference in the tumour stages at time of the operation between the eradication and no eradication groups. A previous gastroscopy within 2 years prior to the cancer diagnosis was performed in 17 (14%) patients. Diffuse-type cancers were missed significantly more often in endoscopies than cancers of intestinal type. Conclusion. Previous H. pylori eradication may delay the detection of gastric cancer if it is given during symptoms caused by tumour.



___
Source: http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=18663664
--
 ~
Powered by [5]RssFwd, a service of [6]Blue Sky Factory, Inc